[ad_1]
Among the underlying components of the Russell 3000 index, we saw noteworthy options trading volume today in Royal Gold Inc (Symbol: RGLD), where a total of 4,017 contracts have traded so far, representing approximately 401,700 underlying shares. That amounts to about 83.3% of RGLD’s average daily trading volume over the past month of 482,035 shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $110 strike call option expiring January 20, 2023, with 1,702 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 170,200 underlying shares of RGLD. Below is a chart showing RGLD’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $110 strike highlighted in orange:
Bloom Energy Corp (Symbol: BE) saw options trading volume of 17,918 contracts, representing approximately 1.8 million underlying shares or approximately 82.8% of BE’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 2.2 million shares.
Particularly high volume was seen for the $20 strike call option expiring January 20, 2023, with 4,524 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 452,400 underlying shares of BE. Below is a chart showing BE’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $20 strike highlighted in orange:
And Constellation Brands Inc (Symbol: STZ) saw options trading volume of 8,835 contracts, representing approximately 883,500 underlying shares or approximately 81.9% of STZ’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 1.1 million shares.
Particularly high volume was seen for the $210 strike put option expiring January 06, 2023, with 1,557 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 155,700 underlying shares of STZ. Below is a chart showing STZ’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $210 strike highlighted in orange:
For the various different available expirations for RGLD options, BE options, or STZ options, visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
Also see:
STEW Historical Stock Prices
CEF shares outstanding history
Institutional Holders of Discover Financial Services
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
[ad_2]
Image and article originally from www.nasdaq.com. Read the original article here.