MEI Pharma (NASDAQ:MEIP) – Looking Into MEI Pharma's Return On Capital Employed

MEI Pharma MEIP brought in sales totaling $11.41 million during Q4 according to data provided by Benzinga Pro. However, earnings decreased 84.1%, resulting in a loss of $16.06 million. MEI Pharma collected $9.69 million in revenue during Q3, but reported earnings showed a $8.72 million loss.

What Is ROCE?

Return on Capital Employed is a measure of yearly pre-tax profit relative to capital employed by a business. Changes in earnings and sales indicate shifts in a company’s ROCE. A higher ROCE is generally representative of successful growth of a company and is a sign of higher earnings per share in the future. A low or negative ROCE suggests the opposite. In Q4, MEI Pharma posted an ROCE of -0.31%.

Keep in mind, while ROCE is a good measure of a company’s recent performance, it is not a highly reliable predictor of a company’s earnings or sales in the near future.

ROCE is a powerful metric for comparing the effectiveness of capital allocation for similar companies. A relatively high ROCE shows MEI Pharma is potentially operating at a higher level of efficiency than other companies in its industry. If the company is generating high profits with its current level of capital, some of that money can be reinvested in more capital which will generally lead to higher returns and, ultimately, earnings per share (EPS) growth.

For MEI Pharma, a negative ROCE ratio of -0.31% suggests that management may not be effectively allocating their capital. Effective capital allocation is a positive indicator that a company will achieve more durable success and favorable long-term returns; poor capital allocation can be a leech on the performance of a company over time.

Upcoming Earnings Estimate

MEI Pharma reported Q4 earnings per share at $-0.16/share, which beat analyst predictions of $-0.19/share.

This article was generated by Benzinga’s automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.



Image and article originally from www.benzinga.com. Read the original article here.